Sunday, November 27, 2022
45.9 F
HomeCommunityNation continues water rights negotiations with state of Oklahoma

Nation continues water rights negotiations with state of Oklahoma

Photo caption: Wah-Zha-Zhi Youth Council members, including Noah Shadlow, participated in a Blue Thumb water quality training at Soldier Creek on Feb. 18, 2017. Osage News 2017 File Photo

The Osage Nation is continuing its negotiations with the state of Oklahoma over water rights in the county.   

The negotiations, expected to take up to two to three years, have been conducted in meetings between Principal Chief Geoffrey Standing Bear and his legal team and Oklahoma Attorney General Mike Hunter and his legal team. Standing Bear said the two entities have been meeting almost monthly since late 2017 and their last meeting was Dec. 6.

In September of 2017, the Nation drilled its first water well on the grounds of the Skiatook Osage Casino, which sits on Osage trust land. The well, permitted under Osage law and issued to the ON Gaming Enterprise Board for five years, caught the attention of the state. A letter from the New Mexico-based legal firm of Modrall Sperling, who represents the Oklahoma Water Resource Board, followed and the negotiations began. To date, the well is still active and is used for Osage Casinos.


Standing Bear said the Nation’s claim to the water stems back to the 1830s when the Nation purchased 1.5 million acres from the Cherokee Nation.

“We have to remember that we bought this reservation with our own money from the Cherokee Nation,” he said. “It’s significant because I believe we can make our claims for what we bought back to the 1830s when the Cherokee Nation came to Oklahoma. They had rights that they received by treaty to the water. So, when we purchased this from Cherokee, we also purchased the water, which is very different than these other tribes.

“I’m not starting in 1906, and I’m not starting in 1872, I’m starting in the 1830s. So, the other side has to prove that we have lost those rights and we will fight every single element of law, and every other single entity and person who says we have lost rights from that time. We are identifying who might make claims against us, and that is a lot of research.”

He said if the Nation prevails sovereignty will be strengthened, and the Nation will be owed a substantial amount of money from different entities who have used water that rightfully belonged to the Osage. Those entities paid someone for its use and the Nation did not see any revenue.

“I believe that a portion of the water that has accumulated in reservoirs, such as Keystone dam, a portion of that water belongs to the Osage people. And, since that dam has been built the water impounded has been used to make electricity, and somebody’s getting paid from that electricity from the use of our water,” he said. “I believe the Corps of Engineers is involved and I believe they are a branch of the federal government, which is our trustee.

“So, we need to address how much money has been made and how much of that belongs to the Osage people, with interest. Going back to the moment they started making money off of that water.”

Standing Bear, who is a seasoned federal Indian law attorney, said there is law in place for water disputes among tribes and other entities called the Winters Doctrine that states tribes are entitled to the water that is necessary to establish and maintain their reservation.

“That has to be researched and assessed, and we’re doing that. There are other issues on surface water because water moves. There’s rain, the flow of water, and these engineers will have their own calculations,” he said. “So, that is pretty much where we are at right now.

“Understanding the histories, the amounts of water, and who are the possible claimants of the water.”


Standing Bear said the Nation has hired the Arizona-based firm Stepson Engineering to conduct research with hydrologists to determine the amount of water being used in Osage County, whether its salt water or fresh water, who is using it and where it’s coming from.

“We expect that the cities and towns will say they have some claim; we expect surface owners, the ranchers, some are going to say when they bought the surface land they have some water rights on there,” Standing Bear said. “We expect other water users, perhaps rural water districts, we don’t know. We expect that other people may want to make claims, so we are researching all potential claims, whether they can be taken seriously or not.”

The discussions are going well, in his opinion and that he couldn’t go into too much detail of the negotiations due to signed confidentiality agreements.

The Chickasaw and Choctaw Nations were successful in negotiating a water rights settlement with the state of Oklahoma and the city of Oklahoma City in 2016. Their dispute was over water rights ownership and regulatory authority within the tribes’ historic treaty territories that spans 22 counties, according to Water Unity Oklahoma. Both nations, located in southeastern Oklahoma, negotiated with the state for five years before reaching a settlement.

Carpenter v. Murphy

A possible component of the Nation’s water rights negotiations could be the outcome of the current U.S. Supreme Court case Carpenter v. Murphy (formerly Murphy v. Royal). The case questions whether the 1866 territorial boundaries of the Creek Nation constitute an “Indian reservation” and if it was ever formally disestablished. According to Oyez, a free online legal source relating to the Supreme Court, the case will most likely be decided before the end of the court’s term in June.

Should the Creek Nation prevail, Standing Bear said the Nation will revisit Osage Nation v. Irby. In 2010, the 10th Circuit Court affirmed that the Osage Nation reservation had been disestablished and the Supreme Court denied certiorari. However, if the Creek Nation does not prevail, Standing Bear said the outcome does not affect the ownership issues of the Nation’s claim to water.

“When we started these negotiations, Oklahoma thought they would model these settlements after the Choctaw and Chickasaw model they had settled,” he said. “They were not correct on that. Now they have realized the Osage is unique and we do not fit with any other model they have been looking at and our claims are much greater than any other tribe in Oklahoma.”


Shannon Shaw Duty

Original Publish Date: 2019-01-22 00:00:00


Get the Osage News by email!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Shannon Shaw Duty
Shannon Shaw Duty is the editor of the Osage News. She is a graduate of the University of Oklahoma with a bachelor's degree in Journalism and a master's degree in Legal Studies, Indigenous Peoples Law from the OU College of Law. She served on the Board of Directors for the Native American Journalists Association (NAJA) from 2013-2016 and served as a board member and Chairwoman for the Pawhuska Johnson O’Malley Parent Committee from 2017-2020. She is a Chips Quinn Scholar, a former instructor for the Freedom Forum’s Native American Journalism Career Conference and the Freedom Forum’s American Indian Journalism Institute. She is a former reporter for The Santa Fe New Mexican. She is a 2012 recipient of the Native American 40 Under 40 from the National Center for American Indian Enterprise Development (NCAIED). In 2014 she helped lead the Osage News to receive the Elias Boudinot Free Press Award, NAJA’s highest honor. An Osage tribal member, she and her family are from the Grayhorse District. She currently resides in Pawhuska, Okla., with her husband and six children.

In Case You Missed it...